Malice Domestic has announced the
nominees for the 2007 Agatha Awards. Agathas will be given in the categories of Best Novel, Best First Novel,
Best Short Story, Best Non-Fiction and Best Children’s/Young Adult Novel. The awards will be presented at the
Malice Domestic XX convention during the Agatha Awards Banquet on April 26,
2008.
Malice
Domestic XX Agatha Nominees:
Best
Novel
The Penguin
Who Knew Too Much, by
Donna Andrews (St. Martin's Minotaur)
Her Royal Spyness, by Rhys
Bowen (Penguin Group)
Hard
Row, by Margaret Maron (Grand Central
Publishing)
A Fatal
Grace, by Louise Penny (St. Martin's Minotaur)
Murder With Reservations, by
Elaine Viets (NAL)
Best First
Novel
A Beautiful
Blue Death, by Charles Finch ( St.
Martin 's Minotaur)
A Real Basket Case, by Beth
Groundwater (Five Star)
Silent In The Grave, by
Deanna Raybourn (Mira)
Prime Time, by Hank Phillipi Ryan
(Harlequin)
Best
Nonfiction
Arthur Conan Doyle: A Life In Letters, by
Charles Foley, Jon Lellenberg , and Daniel Stashower (Penguin Press)
The
Official Nancy Drew Handbook, by Penny Warner (Quirck Productions)
Best
Short Story
"A Rat's Tale", by Donna Andrews (Ellery
Queen Mystery Magazine Sept/Oct, 2007)
"Please Watch Your Step", by
Rhys Bowen (The Strand, Spring, 2007)
"Casino Gamble", by Nan
Higginson (Murder New
York Style, L & L Dreamspell)
"Popping
Round To The Post", by Peter Lovesey (Ellery Queen Mystery Magazine,
November, 2007)
"Death Will
Clean Your Closet", by Elizabeth Zelvin (Murder
New York Style, L & L
Dreamspell)
Best
Children's/Young Adult
A Light In The Cellar, by Sarah
Masters Buckey (American Girl)
Bravo Zulu, Samantha!, by Kathleen
Benner Duble (Peachtree Publishers)
Cover-Up: Mystery At The Super
Bowl, by John Feinstein (Knopf [Random House])
The
Falconer's Knot, by Mary Hoffman (Bloomsbury
USA Childrens'
Books)
Theodosia And
The Serpents Of Chaos, by R.L. LaFevers (Houghton Mifflin)
Having worked in publishing, with actual editorial experience at three "big publishing" houses, I thought I'd dispel a few myths that have been bandied about here. In my five years in editorial, I acquired both fiction and non-fiction. I've sat in hundreds of editorial meetings, and gotten thousands of submissions from reputable--and disreputable--agents. This is not to toot any sort of horn, but merely to offer proof that I know what I'm talking about. Anyway:
1) Amazon, despite what Yvonne says, is not a distributor. They are a retailer. There is a huge difference. A distributor buys x number of books from a publisher, then "distributes" them among their sales channels. Levy is an example of a distributor. Ingram is a distributor. Distributors have a financial stake in the success of the book. If it does not sell, they lose money.
2) Amazon is not the preferred distributor, or retailer, or anything like that. They are a piece of the puzzle, sure, but as of today only about 3%-5% of that puzzle. Brick and mortar stores, with few exceptions, are the most important part of the puzzle (though big box stores, like Sam's Club and BJ's are growing in importance). It costs Amazon nothing to put up a page for a self-published book, and it certainly doesn't mean they have to order any copies. If a self-published book doesn't sell any copies on Amazon, they lose nothing but the time it took to post the page.
3) There are authors who benefit from self-publishing, but they are extremely rare. They are, with very few exceptions, non-fiction authors who have either a substantial platform or take part in many speaking engagements at which to sell their books. In this case, they benefit from increased royalties. Many NF authors that publish with traditional publishers actually negotiate to buy back a certain amount of copies--at a large discount--in order to both sell at their lectures as well as in B&M stores. Though yes, it is true that sometimes publishers do acquire a book solely because the author commits to a substantial buyback. Yes this is cynical publishing, but publishing is a business, and publishers do what they need to do to stay in business.
4) Big name publishing is only watching if you make them watch. The fact of the matter is, when a self-published novel comes in on submission, it is assumed, often correctly, that the novel could not find a mainstream publisher. Yes, there are self-published novels that are well-written and do eventually land contracts, but again they are exceedingly few and far between. Anyone who thinks self-publishing is the best route to getting a mainstream contract, give me a ring, I have some real estate to sell you...
5) "Big Publishing" generally takes longer to publish books because it takes months to properly sell and promote the book to their accounts. Any publisher, if they wanted to could, put out a book out lickity split. In fact, those books are called "crash books," and they're only done if a book is especially timely and/or publicity driven. But if you print a book in a month just because you can, Barnes & Noble, Borders, Amazon, etc...wouldn't take diddly squat because they'd have no reason to.
6) Publishers do drop the ball. That's the way it works, unfortunately. Good books go unread and don't get the promotion they need or deserve, and bad books become monster bestsellers. Hell, "Fools Gold" was #1 at the box office.
7) There's no doubt publishing is changing, though change is certainly taking its time. The Kindle might be doing well relatively, but ebooks are such a small fraction of book sales (like 1% of 1%) that it's far too early in the device's release for it to have made anywhere near a dent, or even a smudge, on the market.
Just a few thoughts.
Jason Pinter