I had a conversation with reviewer Cameron Hughes recently where the topic of private eye clichés came up. Cameron was complaining about the use of jazz in PI novels (I'll let him explain his position further, if he wants) and I responded with the alcoholic PI.
To amuse myself, I started making a list of other overused clichés and gimmicks from PI novels. Here's what I came up with. (Note: some of these would also apply to other types of crime novels.)
- The psycho sidekick who does the dirty work so that the hero can keep his hands clean.
- The detective who's a gourmet cook.
- The detective who drives a flashy car. (Would you really try to tail someone in a Ferrari or Shelby Cobra?)
- The detective as social worker -- not only does he solve your case, he heals your soul.
- The detective who's a gimmick instead of a character: he loves Bugs Bunny, he's got OCD, he's a leper, he's a left-handed transsexual, he thinks he's from Mars, etc.
- (I'm using "he" to make it easier, but all of these would apply to female PI's as well.)
Naturally, any of that stuff can still work in the right hands. I like Ken Bruen's books a lot and Jack Taylor is the prototypical boozer. But it's definitely something that I would caution any aspiring PI novel writer to be aware of. (The first rule to using a cliché is knowing that it's a cliché.)
Does these bother you when you come across them in a novel? And what are some of your favorites?
I stand corrected.
Posted by: Guyot | February 16, 2008 at 07:29 PM
How does one stand corrected? You either stand naturally, or not.
Posted by: Elaine Flinn | February 16, 2008 at 07:35 PM
JLW is correct in his definitions of icon, trope, etc.
However, there is no universal agreement as to which things are icons, which are cliches, which are archetypes, and so on. All those things are judgment calls.
If you don't like the boozing PI, you call it a cliche, and make the case that it has lost its impact.
If it speaks to your inner being, you call it an archetype, and make the case that it clearly still has impact.
If you feel neutral about it, you call it a genre trope, and make the case that without it, there's no genre.
The words do not mean the same things. JLW is absolutely correct.
However, each of them can be used--and used in valid ways--to refer to the same fictional element, depending on the perspective of the person speaking.
Which is what I was getting at in the first place.
Posted by: Keith | February 16, 2008 at 08:12 PM
Concur completely. I was only trying to make the point that a cliché by definition isn't the same thing as all them other things. If you call it a cliché, you've already made a judgment.
Posted by: JLW | February 16, 2008 at 08:24 PM
Posting in an ongoing conversation just to say nothing interesting, act bored and superior, and insult the host "is what it is" too, but one hopes an author will transcend his genre.
To use a layman's phrase.
Posted by: Keith | February 16, 2008 at 09:47 PM
Do you think Walt speaks with a snooty English accent?
Posted by: Dave White | February 17, 2008 at 10:18 AM
I think Walt speaks with slurred consonants.
Posted by: Keith | February 17, 2008 at 11:22 AM
Guyot, sweetheart, the only name I drop is Rin Tin Tin's.
Posted by: Sarah | February 17, 2008 at 02:17 PM
Not knowing the man myself, is it possible "Walt" Mosley was being funny?
Posted by: Judy Bobalik | February 17, 2008 at 05:41 PM
Oh, crap. Maybe I should click on links before opening my mouth.
Posted by: Dave White | February 17, 2008 at 07:30 PM
Isn't it more likely that "Walt" has nothing to do with Walter Mosley whatsoever, but has simply appropriated his name and linked to his website?
I've met Walter Mosley several times and he's a very pleasant man. I do not see him getting snarky on a prominent reviewer's blog.
I also seem to recall this happening before -- someone posing as Walter Mosley, I mean -- on another blog a few years ago.
Posted by: JLW | February 18, 2008 at 02:47 PM
I pose as Walter Mosley sometimes when no one's home.
Posted by: Keith | February 18, 2008 at 03:07 PM
As a trainee Medical Thriller writer, thanks for the post and the discussion.
I would like to add one more cliche -:
the ex-cop/government agent/ detective looking after some loved one/child, who will no doubt be targetted by the ‘bad guys’ within the first 3 chapter = Inciting Incident.
Oh. Pass. I might use that one!
LOL More please.
Posted by: Ray-Anne | February 20, 2008 at 06:23 AM
What about the CLUE delivered by the 2 bad guys telling the PI to stop what he is doing before something BAD happens. Again and again I read this sequence written by some of the top mystery writers, enough is enough. Find another way to move the story along. If this device has not grown stale for others I would be surprised.
Posted by: Pete Daniels | February 20, 2008 at 03:43 PM
Set your life time easier get the personal loans and all you need.
Posted by: Beryl21Huffman | April 20, 2010 at 09:41 PM
i think,even good writers seem to rechurn the same old.i read some leonards that sound so much the same,i think,the genre is dead.we need to do focus on something else,
Posted by: karanja | July 27, 2010 at 10:26 AM
shit,who reads anymore,these days few people can read an email longer than 3 paragraghs,i think,the novel is dying,that's it.people want to sit down and watch for 2hrs tops,and that's it.
ok,maybe some of you guys have read so many books,and coz of that everything sounds just like a cliche
Posted by: karanja | July 27, 2010 at 10:32 AM
Even if the individual develops the same symptoms or health conditions that their parents or other family members had...chances are, if it is a degenerative condition...
Posted by: cheap ugg boots | November 04, 2010 at 01:33 AM
Noir Nation is looking for writers, stories, and graphic novels in category crime/noir.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0MlSe6zU-k
More info: alan@noirnation.com
Posted by: Mr THomas Alan Thomas | June 02, 2011 at 07:49 AM